- This morning one of our senior computer science students did their senior seminar on Silverlight, a new web technology developed by Microsoft to enable .NET client-side programming on the Web. Like the Flash player, Silverlight first requires the engine to be downloaded and installed. I got it to work just fine with Firefox (although I hate restarting my browser, especially when I have 20 different pages open). This technology looks promising, especially if Microsoft really pushes hard for adoption. I wonder why they don't include it along with Flash in Vista? Maybe they're afraid of another bundling lawsuit.
- One of the examples used in the Silverlight presentation was Microsoft's new search engine, Tafiti. Tafiti is powered by Live Search, but it uses Silverlight for it's interface. Tafiti is a perfect example of how a pretty interface does not necessarily make your application any more usable (see the tree of search results below for "Harding University").
P.S. I noticed today (3 days after this post) that the Tafiti tree view screen was eating 25% of my CPU cycles! I opened another tree view window to view different results, and 50% of my CPU cycles were being used! So not only is the screen useless, it will also cause your computer to waste time and energy. Booo. - Google has recently improved their date range functionality on the advanced search. These improvements allow you to do things like, find the pages Google crawled from my blog within the past week.
- And Google is offering $30 million to the first team able to send a robotic rover to the moon that is capable of roaming the surface and sending readings back to Earth. Of course accomplishing such a feat is going to cost much more than $30 million, but it's a nice gesture.
- And just for fun: Sidesplitting tech comics.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Fav5
My pick of the week's top 5 items of interest:
Labels:
fav5,
google,
microsoft,
search engines,
web applications
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOn Silverlight: people will be like, "great, another plug-in that does exactly what Flash does".
ReplyDeleteI'm not the biggest fan of .NET as it is, so I'm biased. Hopefully Silverlight is easier to manage than SVG.
I'm actually kinda stoked about Silverlight (assuming it runs on other platforms). I've heard that video performance is good, which is important to me.
Penny Arcade: pwns the competition! So, so funny (and disturbing). It's one of the better drawn comics out there.
"P.S. I noticed today (3 days after this post) that the Tafiti tree view screen was eating 25% of my CPU cycles! I opened another tree view window to view different results, and 50% of my CPU cycles were being used! So not only is the screen useless, it will also cause your computer to waste time and energy. Booo."
ReplyDeleteWelcome to the early days of Flash development! It was hard work not eating up all the CPU time with web apps. I bet this could be done so as to not use so much CPU time; I'm curious if it's a function of Silverlight or a function of programming methods that are always calculating stuff.
When an interface is in a 'resting state', there should be no or little CPU load. One thing that helped me in Flash dev was to start to use timers instead of clip loops, and to also dynamically adjust the quality when the load got too high (less antialiasing calc). It has to be a consideration during planning.
People (including myself) have bemoaned the lack of Flash on the iPhone, but the big reason is probably it's demanding use of the CPU.
Consider asking students to design for mobile or low-end hardware; that'll bring stuff down to earth quickly.
My guess is it's bad programming. Maybe they're using loops like you said instead of timers. Or maybe it's using a lot of cycles computing where each leaf is moving. I'm really surprised Microsoft would release something so obviously flawed. (Yes, I've just opened myself open for a million jokes. ;-)
ReplyDelete